- Forums
- Physics
- Classical Physics

- Thread starteranandzoom
- Start date
- Tags
- DerivationMotion

In summary, the formula d=vt+1/2at^2 can be derived by calculating the average velocity and using the equations for displacement and acceleration. It can also be derived using calculus by integrating the equations for velocity and acceleration.

- #1

anandzoom

- 11

- 0

d=vt+1/2at^2

Derive me this formula please... When I do I get 1/2(vt+at^2)...i know that I'm doing a mistake by not considering the initial velocity... So how do I correct it?

Last edited by a moderator:

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

berkeman

Mentor

- 67,477

- 20,625

anandzoom said:

d=vt+1/2at^2

Derive me this formula please... When I do I get 1/2(vt+at^2)...i know that I'm doing a mistake by not considering the initial velocity... So how do I correct it?

Welcome to the PF.

Can you show us the steps of your derivation? That will help us find any errors.

- #3

anandzoom

- 11

- 0

berkeman said:

Welcome to the PF.

Can you show us the steps of your derivation? That will help us find any errors.

v=d/t ;d=vt

a=d/t^2 ;d=at^2

1/2d+1/2d=1/2vt+1/2at^2

d=1/2(vt+at^2)

- #4

berkeman

Mentor

- 67,477

- 20,625

anandzoom said:

See AlsoUnderstanding the D = Vit + 1/2at^2 Formula | Tips and TricksWhy is the distance calculation multiplied by one half in this physics problem?v=d/t ;d=vt

a=d/t^2 ;d=at^2

1/2d+1/2d=1/2vt+1/2at^2

d=1/2(vt+at^2)

Thank you, that helps. Have you had any Calculus yet? Are you familiar with derivatives?

- #5

anandzoom

- 11

- 0

berkeman said:

Thank you, that helps. Have you had any Calculus yet? Are you familiar with derivatives?

Yup

- #6

berkeman

Mentor

- 67,477

- 20,625

anandzoom said:

Yup

Great. In that case, where did the bolded equation come from below?

anandzoom said:

v=d/t ;d=vt

a=d/t^2 ;d=at^2

1/2d+1/2d=1/2vt+1/2at^2

d=1/2(vt+at^2)

- #7

anandzoom

- 11

- 0

berkeman said:

Great. In that case, where did the bolded equation come from below?

acceleration= velocity/time

- #8

berkeman

Mentor

- 67,477

- 20,625

anandzoom said:

acceleration= velocity/time

Actually it's the change in velocity over time, or in calculus, a(t) = dv(t)/dt.

But it's also possible to do the derivation for a constant acceleration using only triangles. Here's a YouTube video that helps to explain it:

- #9

anandzoom

- 11

- 0

How can you say that displacement is area under the velocity curve?

- #10

berkeman

Mentor

- 67,477

- 20,625

anandzoom said:

How can you say that displacement is area under the velocity curve?

That's from calculus:

v(t) = dx(t)/dt

a(t) = dv(t)/dt

So when you integrate both sides of the first equation, you are effectively finding the "area under the curve"...

[tex]x = \int{v(t) dt}[/tex]

- #11

anandzoom

- 11

- 0

Ok thanks

- #12

rcgldr

Homework Helper

- 8,873

- 632

If acceleration is constant, then you can use algebra instead of calculus. Note that Δt means change in time, Δx means change in position, a = acceleration, v = velocity.

initial velocity = v

final velocity = v + a Δt

average velocity = (initial velocity + final velocity) / 2 = ((v) + (v a Δt))/2 = v + 1/2 a Δt

Δx = average velocity Δt = (v + 1/2 a Δt) Δt = v Δt + 1/2 a Δt^2

Last edited:

- #13

guedman

- 4

- 1

it is not possible to write v = d/t but v=dx/dt and a = dv/dt

then v(t) =∫a(t)dt =at + v , v is the initial velocity and the acceleration a is constant.

it comes : x(t) =∫v(t)dt = 1/2 at^2 + vt + x(0), x(0) is the initial position assumed nill then x(0) =0

finally the distance d is x(t) =d= vt + 1/2 a t^2

## Related to How do I correctly derive the formula d = vt + 1/2 at^2?

## 1. How do you derive the equation D=vt+1/2at^2?

To derive the equation D=vt+1/2at^2, we start with the definition of acceleration, which is the rate of change of velocity over time. This can be represented as a=Δv/Δt. We can rearrange this to solve for velocity, giving us v=aΔt. We then substitute this value for velocity into the equation for distance, D=vt, giving us D=aΔtΔt. Simplifying this, we get D=at^2. Since this equation only accounts for constant acceleration, we add in the initial velocity term, giving us the final equation D=vt+1/2at^2.

## 2. What does each term in the equation D=vt+1/2at^2 represent?

The D in the equation represents the total distance traveled, v is the initial velocity, t is the time, a is the constant acceleration, and 1/2at^2 represents the change in distance due to acceleration. Essentially, this equation combines the equations for constant velocity (D=vt) and constant acceleration (D=1/2at^2) into one formula.

## 3. How is the equation D=vt+1/2at^2 used in physics?

The equation D=vt+1/2at^2 is commonly used in physics to determine the distance an object has traveled under constant acceleration. This is useful in a variety of scenarios, such as calculating the distance a car travels during braking or the distance a ball travels when thrown into the air.

## 4. Can the equation D=vt+1/2at^2 be used for non-constant acceleration?

No, the equation D=vt+1/2at^2 is only valid for constant acceleration. If the acceleration is changing, the equation must be modified to account for this. However, in cases where the acceleration is changing at a constant rate, this equation can still be used by breaking the motion into smaller intervals with constant acceleration.

## 5. Are there any limitations to using the equation D=vt+1/2at^2?

Yes, there are several limitations to using this equation. Firstly, it only applies to motion with constant acceleration. Additionally, it assumes that there is no external force acting on the object, and that the acceleration is in the same direction as the initial velocity. It also does not take into account other factors such as air resistance or friction, which can affect the motion of an object. Finally, this equation is only applicable in the absence of relativistic effects.

### Similar threads

IContradiction in formula for motional EMF

- Classical Physics

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 791

IDeriving the relativistic rocket equation with exhaust efficiency

- Classical Physics

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 438

IAnother interpretation of Lorentz transformations

- Classical Physics

2

- Replies
- 53

- Views
- 3K

Object A (in free fall) hits object B (ascending with constant velocity)

- Introductory Physics Homework Help

- Replies
- 33

- Views
- 975

BFinding Gravitational Acceleration

- Classical Physics

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 836

BRegarding the Galilean transformation of x'=x-vt

- Classical Physics

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 3K

BThe relationship between mc^2 and mc^2 x 1/2

- Classical Physics

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 543

IDerivative operators in Galilean transformations

- Classical Physics

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 3K

ILacking intuition with partial derivatives

- Classical Physics

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 1K

IPower done by work on a continuous body isn't the derivative of work?

- Classical Physics

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 871

- Forums
- Physics
- Classical Physics